« Are Open Market Operations wrong-signed when nominal rates are negative? (No) | Main | NAFTA - The “Worst” Trade Deal Ever »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Excellent post. I completely agree.

Nice post with good message. Unfortunately, memories of the 80s are dimming.

Thanks Scott and John!


A second thought. If the main cost of inflation is the cost of bring it down, why bother?

. I think inflation has substantial costs in addition to the cost of bringing it down.

John: if the cost of bringing inflation down were the *only* cost, then I agree: why bother? But if it's just the *main* cost, and there are costs to inflation per se (as I agree there are), we would get a one-way ratchet of ever increasing inflation (which would be bad) if we never bring it down after a missed target.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Search this site

  • Google

Blog powered by Typepad