« NHL Ticket Revenue, Relocation and Exchange Rates | Main | The concrete impacts of taxes »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Paul Rogers: I have unpublished your latest comment, in which you repeat your previous comment. Please do not comment here again.

"The existing stock of debt represents the costs of past deficits that cannot be undone. We can't turn back the clock. But the fact that we cannot turn back the clock on past deficits says absolutely nothing about whether we should run a deficit now. We need to compare the benefits to the cost to future taxpapers."

I personally welcome your exploration of optimizing fiscal policy to determine whether or not it is a burden. :)

Unemployed labor seems to be an optimal target for fiscal policy given if it is unused, it is gone forever.

Providing a framework where government directed spending on unemployed labor is a net positive for future generations is a worthwhile endeavor. MMT has yet to convince a broad audience!

Too bad most examples from history involve war. Mark Thoma links to an LA Times article...

"South Korea, for example, during the meltdown of 1997-'98, implemented a Master Plan for Tackling Unemployment that accounted for 10% of government expenditure. It employed workers on public projects that included cultivating forests, building small public facilities, repairing public utilities, environmental cleanup work, staffing community and welfare centers, and information/technology-related projects targeted at the young and computer-literate. The overall economy expanded and thrived in the aftermath."


Perhaps with this Canadian initiative could help us move into a new global phase, replacing arguably burdensome war with not so burdensome community service.

If this labor drains resources from production processes that promise superior output in the future, and the labor is put to use doing counter-productive things which will required labor and resources to fix in the future, then "putting unemployed labor to work" is a net negative.

Watch the video of workers expending labor and resources to dispose of "green" cars subsidized by the U.S. government ....

You have to look at the real world and think these things through -- wishing doesn't make things actual.

Winslow writes.

"Providing a framework where government directed spending on unemployed labor is a net positive for future generations is a worthwhile endeavor."

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search this site

  • Google

Blog powered by Typepad